Go Back   The Consumer Forums > The Consumer Forums
The Bank Action Group - against unlawful bank charges
> Other Institutions > Egg

  CAG Announcements
 
Welcome Guest
Please register
Registration is free
There are no charges for using any of the facilities of this website.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. You will have to register before you can post. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You will also have to register to access our template letters and claims forms
registration is free
Are you being threatened over debts more than 6 years old?
This may be unfair
See our new Unfair Trading Guide
eBay buyer?
Buy more cheaply
Win more often
ConsumerSniper.com
Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file?
Check it out
Ebay buyer?
ConsumerSniper
Free unlimited bids and eBay tools
Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file?
Check it out
 
 

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 6th March 2010, 11:52   #1 (permalink)
Default Cupcake vs Egg 03

Hi

I wonder if anyone can give me some advice on this Eggautolinker.com autolinking image agreement please?

TC EGG pictures by cupcake62 - Photobucket

It was not an online agreement and was taken out in 2003.

I think I need to write to ARC and explain the agreement does not have the prescribed terms?

Thank you

Cupcake

Last edited by cupcake68; 10th March 2010 at 16:45.
cupcake68 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10th March 2010, 16:47   #2 (permalink)
 
Your bank owes you an awful lot more money than you realise See here

Cagger since : Feb 2009
Posts: 977
cupcake68 Novitiate
Default Re: Cupcake vs Egg 03

Can anyone tell me if I am correct?

I am getting better at knowing what the prescribed terms are but Eggautolinker.com autolinking image appear to have different rules (or is that what they want me to think?)

This was not an online account so do I treat it as any other agreement?

Thanks

Cupcake
cupcake68 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11th March 2010, 17:21   #3 (permalink)
Default Re: Cupcake vs Egg 03

Now had a letter from Trevor Munn.

A county court claimautolinker.com autolinking image has now been prepared and is ready to be issued against you to Northampton county courtautolinker.com autolinking image. The following costs will be added Debt bal xxx
Court fees £85 and solicitors costs £80.

As you can see the issue of Court proceedings will mean that the amount you owe our client will increase by £165.

YOU CAN STOP THIS CLAIM BEING ISSUED AND THE DEBT INCREASING BY PAYING IN FULL NOW.

Alternatively, if you are in financial difficulty then complete the form below and return it to us immediately with an initial payment and we will consider your situation.

It is still not too late but you must act NOW. So send your payment TODAY or call ARC directly...........

Should I send them this?

Dear Sir/Madam

I refer to your letter of XXX, the content of which is noted. No debt to your client is acknowledged.

In XXXX I made a formal request to your client pursuant to s.78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. They have failed to comply within the statutory time limit, or at all. It should not be necessary to have to remind solicitors that the provisions of s.78(6) now apply.

In the circumstances, your threat of legal action would appear to be a breach of the Consumer Protection From Unfair Tradingautolinker.com autolinking image Regulations 2008 and the Office of Fair Trading Guidance on debt collection. Should you or your client bring proceedings, they will be robustly defended, and the Court's attention drawn to the above statutory breaches.
Furthermore, I reserve the right to bring the conduct of your client to the Court when the issue of costs is being considered.

Yours faithfully

Any advice gratefully received

Cupcake
cupcake68 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st April 2010, 21:08   #4 (permalink)
 
Our auction sniper is now live. Try it for free

Cagger since : Feb 2009
Posts: 977
cupcake68 Novitiate
Default Re: Cupcake vs Egg 03

I am still not sure about this account!!

Have sent this to ARC

Thank you for responding to my formal request under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a copy of the compliant executed agreement relating to the above account.

However, unfortunately the document you provided does not satisfy this request, in that it is an application form and does not contain the prescribed terms and conditionsautolinker.com autolinking image necessary to make it an agreement enforceable by the Courts. I am sure you must be aware, in the current climate, of what the prescribed terms are, but if you are in any doubt I will be pleased to elaborate.

Consequently, until a valid executed agreement is supplied, the account remains in dispute and as such further enforcement action cannot be taken.

I am fully aware of the recent test caseautolinker.com autolinking image of RBSautolinker.com autolinking image vs McGuffick, however to pre-empt any attempt at confusion on your part I would point out that this referred to an agreement which was compliant but temporarily unavailable, therefore does not apply in my case.

With regard to the definition of "enforcement", I would remind you also that you are still required to comply with OFT debt collecting guidelines in order to retain your Consumer Credit Licence.

I am anxious to be reasonable in this matter, therefore I am allowing you a further 14 days in which to comply with the requirements of my request and supply a valid agreement.

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.


Letter thanks to Nurse Elsa on another of my threads. It seems to have given them something to think about .....I hope this is right!!

Any advice greatly appreciated.

Cupcake
cupcake68 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 4th May 2010, 20:12   #5 (permalink)
 
Protect your signature with SignGuard

Cagger since : Feb 2009
Posts: 977
cupcake68 Novitiate
Default Re: Cupcake vs Egg 03

Now I'm really confused!! (probably their plan!!)

I have received a letter from Eggautolinker.com autolinking image apparently in reply to my letter received 16th April.

Would this be the letter I sent ARC?

Should I send them a list of the prescribed terms?

Thanks

Cupcake
cupcake68 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 4th May 2010, 20:20   #6 (permalink)
 
Protect your signature with SignGuard

Cagger since : Mar 2009
Posts: 453
freethemice Novitiate
Default Re: Cupcake vs Egg 03

You seem to be in the stage I refer to as 'letter tennis'.

All you can do is state again and again the legal points you would hope to rely on when/if this goes to court as to why you are not paying and feel they have been unreasonable in their response to your s78 request.

Be aware though that they do have a wide range of documents they can send in response to a s78 request after the recent Carey v HSBCautolinker.com autolinking image case but should be 'honest' if this is a reconstruction or if the original is no longer available.

The default notice is my prefered area of combat if you have this.
freethemice is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 4th May 2010, 21:23   #7 (permalink)
 
Is your bank avoiding its debts
Data disclosure poll

Cagger since : Feb 2009
Posts: 977
cupcake68 Novitiate
Default Re: Cupcake vs Egg 03

Hi FTM

Thanks for your advice.

They have supplied me with the paperwork I signed at the time of taking out the cc but I don't think it has the necessary terms on it.

Their DN gave me almost a month to pay but I am not very good yet at understanding what else may be wrong with a DN. They terminated on the date stated on the DN.

Cupcake
cupcake68 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2010, 15:35   #8 (permalink)
 
Protect your signature with SignGuard

Cagger since : Feb 2009
Posts: 977
cupcake68 Novitiate
Default Re: Cupcake vs Egg 03

They are asking why I think my agreement is unenforceable!!

Should I just tell them to read the CCA 1974 to find what is required in an agreement to make it enforceable?

Cupcake
cupcake68 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools





The new Consumer Directory
search the web, shop online, looking for gift ideas?

Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139