| |||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Notices |
| NatWest Bank Meet other NatWest Bank customers who have also been faced with excessive unfair bank charges. Exchange encouragement and information about getting your bank charges refunded |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Basic Account Holder | What happens now??? I filed my claim in 2006, I declined the offer that was given to me which was at least 2 thirds of the money i was claiming; now i wish i had just accepted it as something would've been better than nothing!!! Not to mention my financial situation wouldnt be in suce a dire condition as it is in now, I cannot even upgrade the account that i am using with Lloyds as NatWest have clearly put a default against my name, every time i want to withdraw money i have to use a Lloyds machine! arrrggghh!!! I'm so p-ed off, what are we supposed to do now??? |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Classic Account Holder Have we helped you? Please help us by making a donation Cagger since : Mar 2009 I am in: the Earth's biosphere
Posts: 1,838
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Redraft your letter using clause 5 ![]() |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Site Team | Watch the announcements on this site.
__________________ If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks. Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment. Please donate, Help us to help others. LINKS.... For all health related issues, visit......... CONSUMER HEALTH FORUMS Forum Rules. FAQs.... |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Basic Account Holder | I'm trying to understand this recent ruling by the supreme court ![]() Apparently we can still use ckause 5 to claim money back under which is good to know But does the ruling only apply to charges for going overdrawn? I have charges for unpaid DD but i never went over drawn is that different or the same thing? should I use clause 5 or 6 for this? |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) | |
| Classic Account Holder Free trial on our eBay auction sniper Cagger since : Mar 2009 I am in: the Earth's biosphere
Posts: 1,838
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Basic Account Holder Worried about companies stealing your signature? Use our new digital signature service Cagger since : Mar 2006
Posts: 393
![]() | |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Basic Account Holder Worried about companies stealing your signature? Use our new digital signature service Cagger since : Mar 2006
Posts: 393
![]() | Could someone please please give me some advice here, I have received 2 letters from NatWest (one for each account), the basics of it is they are not upholding my complaint, because of the legal outcome. Can I please have some advice on what to do now??? |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Classic Account Holder Your bank owes you an awful lot more money than you realise See here Cagger since : Jan 2007
Posts: 1,432
![]() ![]() | I am in a similar situation re my brothers claim, but there are two ideas I have in mind. Clearly one option is waiting for new announcements here and elsewhere, however there is another option which I am willing to try. I have a court claim in the system but have recently recieved a letter from NatWest as above because they also have a complaint in thier system. Now they have changed thier charges down to £5 for unpaid items so I am going to request in line with the practice on credit cards that the difference is refunded. There is little chance this will work but its worth a shot. There are at least two different sets of charges I can see that were applied, plus the charges now that are much lower. Thier position may be that at all times all charges were perfectly fair and reasonable, but it would seem a strange position to take. My brothers OD was £1000, the charges (without ![]() Any advice by PM is welcome.
__________________ The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk. |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Basic Account Holder Give yourself a better chance with our claims guides and litigation kits Cagger since : Mar 2006
Posts: 393
![]() | I have a time limit; on the letters I have to respond within a certain amount of time. Can anyone tell me what the situation is with rewriting the whole way to make the claim? I dont seem to see any announcements on it, have we all been forgotten??? I need to do this asap or my whole claim that has been going on for almost 4 years is going to get closed. |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Basic Account Holder | Beg them to make the same offer? I don't really know your whole case against them but you are in the justice system now and they seem to be acting tough, consult a solicitor for advice? Or post full details on here so we can see what is happening. |
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| Site Team The Consumer Action Group Free trial on our eBay auction sniper Cagger since : May 2006 I am in: St.Helens Merseyside
Posts: 25,476
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | So can you just confirm the position. Are these claims in Court ? How many Which banks
__________________ Please take time to read up. Respect other users -no libel or flaming If you cant see what you need-ask Patience is a virtue - dont we know it. All advice and guidance offered is done so without liability,and is personal experience and views only.If in doubt seek professional help from a legally trained professional. Your views and thoughts count,we welcome any suggestions for improvements. |
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) | |
| Basic Account Holder Worried about companies stealing your signature? Use our new digital signature service Cagger since : Mar 2006
Posts: 393
![]() | Quote:
Two accounts savings and current with NatWest. My case went all the way, I even got an offer of almost 2 thirds of my claim, but following the advice I pushed it and went all the way (now in hindsight I wish I had just taken it) They were both stayed pending the appeal. This is the letter dated 7 Jan 2010 We refer to your complaint relating to unarranged ![]() terms of the ![]() complaint. We consider your complaint to have been about the level and, accordingly, the fairness or lawfulness of these charges. As you will be aware from when we last wrote to you, we (with several other banks) entered into agreed legal proceedings with the Office of Fair Trading in relation to unarranged ![]() gain clarity on this issue. Following the judgment of the Supreme Court on 25 November 2009, the ![]() process is now complete. In our view, the judgment of the Supreme Court means that the level of the unarranged ![]() have complained about cannot be assessed for fairness under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 or challenged under the common law penalty doctrine. We do not believe that there is any other legal basis on which the level of these charges can be challenged. We are satisfied that the charges you seek to reclaim were properly charged and the outcome of the legal proceedings confirms our position. We are therefore not upholding your complaint and will not be refunding the unarranged overdraft charges you have complained about. We are happy to address any questions you have arising from this letter. You may find these answered by our website at the following link www.natwest.com/overdraftchargesuodate. If your complaint does not relate to the level and, accordingly, the fairness or lawfulness of these charges then please let us know by contacting us selling out the details so we can consider this further. If after this you remain dissatisfied, we will provide you with details of how to refer your complaint to the Financial ![]() If we do not hear from you within 8 weeks of this letter we will regard your complaint as closed. If you have any questions or wish to discuss any of the above with one of our members of staff, please call us on 0845 3030 456. Lines are open 9.OOam - S.OOpm Monday to Friday or 9.OOam - 1 .OOpm Saturday. | |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) |
| Classic Account Holder | Everyone has had the same letter, you can either waith for some new templates or have a bash yourself. Someone posted a pretty good first draft making reference to lack of competition, the contract not being individually negotiated and the fact the bank is a wholly dominant partner. I'm going to try and find that to inform my own letter. I'll post that and see what people think of it. |
| | |
| | #15 (permalink) |
| Site Team The Consumer Action Group Our auction sniper is now live. Try it for free Cagger since : May 2006 I am in: St.Helens Merseyside
Posts: 25,476
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | So Choco this letter appears to refer to your complaint and not the actual Court case.Can you confirm that you have had nothing back from Court ?
__________________ Please take time to read up. Respect other users -no libel or flaming If you cant see what you need-ask Patience is a virtue - dont we know it. All advice and guidance offered is done so without liability,and is personal experience and views only.If in doubt seek professional help from a legally trained professional. Your views and thoughts count,we welcome any suggestions for improvements. |
| | |
| | #16 (permalink) | |
| Basic Account Holder | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #18 (permalink) |
| Site Team The Consumer Action Group Our auction sniper is now live. Try it for free Cagger since : May 2006 I am in: St.Helens Merseyside
Posts: 25,476
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Ok.So presumably the bank is waiting for you to confirm that you dont further wish to pursue the complaint.Although indirectly it does not impact on any claim that you have in Court,It could be used by them as a lever to say that your claim should now be struck out since you have withdrawn your complaint,or else do not wish to take it further. I have seen letters for use in this scenario which advise that whilst it is accepted that the Supreme Court did rule against the OFT,nevertheless there was mention that further avenues were possible,although the OFT has since made it clear that they wont be taking things further.
__________________ Please take time to read up. Respect other users -no libel or flaming If you cant see what you need-ask Patience is a virtue - dont we know it. All advice and guidance offered is done so without liability,and is personal experience and views only.If in doubt seek professional help from a legally trained professional. Your views and thoughts count,we welcome any suggestions for improvements. |
| | |
| | #19 (permalink) |
| Site Team The Consumer Action Group Protect your signature with SignGuard Cagger since : May 2006 I am in: St.Helens Merseyside
Posts: 25,476
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | It is up to you to decide whether to wait instructions from the Court,or else take steps to inform the bank that you do not consider it closed.
__________________ Please take time to read up. Respect other users -no libel or flaming If you cant see what you need-ask Patience is a virtue - dont we know it. All advice and guidance offered is done so without liability,and is personal experience and views only.If in doubt seek professional help from a legally trained professional. Your views and thoughts count,we welcome any suggestions for improvements. |
| | |
| | #20 (permalink) |
| Basic Account Holder Give yourself a better chance with our claims guides and litigation kits Cagger since : Mar 2006
Posts: 393
![]() | Ok, the thing is I do not want to close the case as we all know the charges are unfair, whether the OFT are helping or not. So how do I go about responding to this, seeing as I like everyone else is waiting for a loophole? |
| | |