Go Back   The Consumer Forums > The Consumer Forums
The Bank Action Group - against unlawful bank charges
> NatWest Bank > NatWest Successes

  CAG Announcements
 
Welcome Guest
Please register
Registration is free
There are no charges for using any of the facilities of this website.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. You will have to register before you can post. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You will also have to register to access our template letters and claims forms
registration is free
Are you being threatened over debts more than 6 years old?
This may be unfair
See our new Unfair Trading Guide
eBay buyer?
Buy more cheaply
Win more often
ConsumerSniper.com
Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file?
Check it out
Ebay buyer?
ConsumerSniper
Free unlimited bids and eBay tools
Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file?
Check it out
 
 

Notices

NatWest Successes **Existing Successful Claims Only *NO* New Threads Please** - Contact a moderator to move your thread

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 14th September 2007, 10:16   #1 (permalink)
Basic Account Holder
Default itsmee v NatWest ** WON **

Firstly what an excellent forum and for all of you who spend the time and effort on this site..well done and thanks

now for my question, I have just applied for my charges and wrote my first letter asking for them to be repaid, i have today receieved a letter from NatWest

It is a long letter which im sure some of you will be aware of content, but it genrally tells me about FSA and the extended timetable in replying, and tells me about a test caseautolinker.com autolinking image and that they have asked the courts not to proceed with any other cases. It also states that if i do roceed to claim they will ask for a stay until the test caseautolinker.com autolinking image is resolved...HELP i wasnt expecting this...it seems a fairly standard letter..what should i do now
itsmee is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2007, 10:20   #2 (permalink)
Gold Account Holder
 
gyzmo's Avatar
 
Try our new digital signature service

Cagger since : Apr 2007
I am in: Hell
Posts: 3,659
gyzmo Highly informativegyzmo Highly informativegyzmo Highly informativegyzmo Highly informativegyzmo Highly informativegyzmo Highly informativegyzmo Highly informative
Default Re: help help help

wait!
gyzmo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2007, 10:24   #3 (permalink)
Basic Account Holder
 
Where else can you earn 8% interest on your money?
Start your County Court claim NOW!!!

Cagger since : Sep 2007
Posts: 21
itsmee Novitiate
Default Re: help help help

Quote:
Originally Posted by gyzmo View Post
wait!
when you say wait....does that mean just let things take their course and do not continue with my claim, the letter says it could take months to be resolved. Im in no rush, its just that most of the forum seems to say carry on regardless and take them to court

oh by the way thanks for your very very prompt response
itsmee is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2007, 10:44   #4 (permalink)
Gold Account Holder
 
gyzmo's Avatar
 
Try our new digital signature service

Cagger since : Apr 2007
I am in: Hell
Posts: 3,659
gyzmo Highly informativegyzmo Highly informativegyzmo Highly informativegyzmo Highly informativegyzmo Highly informativegyzmo Highly informativegyzmo Highly informative
Default Re: help help help

My apologies - I was a bit short in my response!

My understanding is that the courts will not proceed on any cases of this matter until the current OFT debacle has concluded, but there is advice to the contrary. I am not sure, but I don't think a judge would be sympathetic to a case in which area a test caseautolinker.com autolinking image is currently going through.

Hopefuly someone else wil post something a bit more definite (and accurate!)
gyzmo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2007, 11:03   #5 (permalink)
Basic Account Holder
 
Is your bank avoiding its debts
Data disclosure poll

Cagger since : Aug 2006
I am in: Bournemouth
Posts: 498
littlesally Informativelittlesally Informativelittlesally Informativelittlesally Informativelittlesally Informative
Default Re: help help help

As I understand it you need to proceed on the normal time scale.
14 days for the reply, which you have had, then send the lbaautolinker.com autolinking image and give them another 14 days.
Although there is the test caseautolinker.com autolinking image gong on, people are still recieving their charges back.
It has always been a bit hit and miss with claims.
Sometimes they pay out straight away - I have read somewhere on here of someone who requested their statements and was refunded the charges without asking for them!! But that is a one off I think.
Other times it gets dragged right out to the last moment.
In my case I sent them a letter basically saying "don't be silly" and they paid out.
Personnally I would continue.
Sally x
littlesally is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2007, 22:00   #6 (permalink)
Site Team
 
IdaInFife's Avatar
 
Try our new digital signature service

Cagger since : Jan 2007
I am in: Fife
Posts: 5,724
IdaInFife AuthoritativeIdaInFife AuthoritativeIdaInFife AuthoritativeIdaInFife AuthoritativeIdaInFife AuthoritativeIdaInFife AuthoritativeIdaInFife AuthoritativeIdaInFife AuthoritativeIdaInFife AuthoritativeIdaInFife AuthoritativeIdaInFife Authoritative
Default Re: help help help

I would agree with sally as I was paid out as well




Idax
__________________
PLEASE SIGN BANK CHARGES PETITION
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/bankchargesuk/


CAG depends on donations. Please consider making a donation - however big or small.

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability.
IdaInFife is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 17th September 2007, 09:31   #7 (permalink)
Basic Account Holder
 
Protect your signature with SignGuard

Cagger since : Sep 2007
Posts: 21
itsmee Novitiate
Default Re: help help help

thanks everyone for your advise...I think I will do what sally says and send my next letter..the 14 days is ove ron this thursday so i will send it then and see what response i get ...thankyou everyone again
itsmee is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 17th September 2007, 09:42   #8 (permalink)
Site Team
 
ukaviator's Avatar
 
Worried about your signature being copied onto CCAs etc? Use SignGuard

Cagger since : Jun 2006
I am in: 10 Miles Final
Posts: 11,564
ukaviator Authoritativeukaviator Authoritativeukaviator Authoritativeukaviator Authoritativeukaviator Authoritativeukaviator Authoritativeukaviator Authoritativeukaviator Authoritativeukaviator Authoritativeukaviator Authoritativeukaviator Authoritative
Default Re: help help help

Hi Itsme

Still follow the procedures, lbaautolinker.com autolinking image next and wait to see what the reply is. I expect it will be held in their system until after the OFT case. It's upto you whether you file with the court or wait. The case will probably be Stayed by the court until after the test caseautolinker.com autolinking image, a while after you file.
ukaviator is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 17th September 2007, 09:44   #9 (permalink)
Royalties Gold Account Holder
 
Bookworm's Avatar
 
We need funds
Please donate something

Cagger since : Feb 2006
I am in: a very bad mood for the last 20 years.
Posts: 20,598
Bookworm AuthoritativeBookworm AuthoritativeBookworm AuthoritativeBookworm AuthoritativeBookworm AuthoritativeBookworm AuthoritativeBookworm AuthoritativeBookworm AuthoritativeBookworm AuthoritativeBookworm AuthoritativeBookworm Authoritative
Default Re: help help help

Moving to NatWest Forum from General Consumer Issues.
Bookworm is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2007, 10:25   #10 (permalink)
Basic Account Holder
 
Protect your signature with SignGuard

Cagger since : Sep 2007
Posts: 21
itsmee Novitiate
Default Re: itsmee v Natwest

okay everyone...ive manage today to read loads and loads of threads and try to get up to speed...It seems now that even if i continue with the claim ( which i will) that all the cases seem to be getting a stay, some by letter and some at the last hour....couple of questions if anyone can answer.

has there been any stays lifted yet and what has been the outcome

If these "stays" are until after the test caseautolinker.com autolinking image, what will be the likely outcome, will your case then be heard based on the precident of the test caseautolinker.com autolinking image

hope to get some advise on this as it seems this is whats happeing to all recent claimants
itsmee is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2007, 09:53   #11 (permalink)
Basic Account Holder
 
Where else can you earn 8% interest on your money?
Start your County Court claim NOW!!!

Cagger since : Sep 2007
Posts: 21
itsmee Novitiate
Default argh..i need help again

Iam looking for a template and cannot seem to find what im looking for..Today is the 14 day deadline and iam now going to send NatWest my third letter. I received the standard letter explaing about the test caseautolinker.com autolinking image and im wondering which letter to send . is there a template that will include anything about the letter i received or should i continue with the normal process .
itsmee is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2007, 11:25   #12 (permalink)
Basic Account Holder
 
Worried about your signature being copied onto CCAs etc? Use SignGuard

Cagger since : Aug 2006
I am in: Bournemouth
Posts: 498
littlesally Informativelittlesally Informativelittlesally Informativelittlesally Informativelittlesally Informative
Default Re: itsmee v Natwest

At this point I sent the letter in post 68.
http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...natwest-3.html
Within a few days I recieved a reply saying they would pay out.
interestautolinker.com autolinking image can not be claimed with this letter, but if they accept it it will save all the waiting.
I know that is has worked for quite a few other's who have used it.
If it doesn't work, you've lost nothing.

Sally x
littlesally is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2007, 11:31   #13 (permalink)
Basic Account Holder
Default Re: itsmee v Natwest

Sally, thanks for your prompt reply

was this the letter you were suggesting.

Thank you for your letter dated 16.11.06 from Mr. Stuart Higley.
You clearly do not believe that I will issue a claim against you for the unfair bank chargesautolinker.com autolinking image against my accounts.


I am writing to inform you that this will be the next stage unless I hear from you, in the next 7 days, that the £380 I am claiming from you will be paid back to me in full.

If you wish to proceed with this, I will be pleased to meet you in court and hear your justifacation of the penalty charges.
And, I am sure, so will all NatWest customers.

If you do not intend to defend the charges in court, but hoping that I will "just go away", I need to point out to you that this will not happen. But you will incur more costs against you by the court.

Please do not waste their time and with something you do not intend to defend.

Yours sincerely

Sally
itsmee is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2007, 12:18   #14 (permalink)
Basic Account Holder
 
Worried about your signature being copied onto CCAs etc? Use SignGuard

Cagger since : Aug 2006
I am in: Bournemouth
Posts: 498
littlesally Informativelittlesally Informativelittlesally Informativelittlesally Informativelittlesally Informative
Default Re: itsmee v Natwest

No, it's the one on the next page.
Hagenuk made it a little more legal like .......

Sally x
littlesally is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2007, 13:01   #15 (permalink)
Basic Account Holder
 
Free trial on our eBay auction sniper

Cagger since : Sep 2007
Posts: 21
itsmee Novitiate
Default Re: itsmee v Natwest

sally...cheers again

seems a great letter, do you think its worth adding anything about the stay, stuff into it, as i feel that they will probably just come back with a similar letter as the last, stating that if it goes to court they will ask for one.
itsmee is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2007, 13:19   #16 (permalink)
Basic Account Holder
 
Protect your signature with SignGuard

Cagger since : Aug 2006
I am in: Bournemouth
Posts: 498
littlesally Informativelittlesally Informativelittlesally Informativelittlesally Informativelittlesally Informative
Default Re: itsmee v Natwest

Not sure to be honest, but if you do could you post what you put as it may help other's.
Sorry

Sally x
littlesally is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2007, 12:14   #17 (permalink)
Basic Account Holder
 
Protect your signature with SignGuard

Cagger since : Sep 2007
Posts: 21
itsmee Novitiate
Default Re: itsmee v Natwest

more help need.

Im trying to compose a letter using sallys original letter and im struggling a bit to get my point acoss. My origianl letter from NatWest, which i assume is standard, suggest they thin the charges are fair, transparent and lawful. It explains that they are awaiting the outcome of the legal case with the OFT and will need to resolve the legal key issues before they can decide how to respond to my claim. It also explains to me that given the court case they have asked fosautolinker.com autolinking image and the courts not to proceed with any other cases until the test caseautolinker.com autolinking image is resolved and that they will request a stay

from my 2 accounts they owe me £2965 and £1028 in charges

To be honest, I dread the thought of having to go to court, im just not that legally minded, probaly why a lot of people will not bother with claims...but it IS unfair on everyone....so given that i really dont want to go to court, is there a way that i can suggest that if they offer me a reduced amount i may accept it, and that if the test caseautolinker.com autolinking image goes in the favour of OFT, then that could be financially beneficial to them.

I wish i could do more to help others, but i feel that a lot of recent complaints of charges will be receiving the same responses from the banks and it would be great for everyone if some sort of response could be made

heres my letter


Dear Sir

Thank you for your letter dated 12 September 2007 from Mrs S. Smith

In your letter you state that you feel the charges are fair, transparent and lawful. Iam aware that NatWest, along with other banks are involved in legal proceedings with the office of fair trading regarding the legality of these charges, and that you wish store my complaint until the outcome

I find this unacceptable and wish to continue with my claim

I feel from your letter that you are under the impression that I will not issue a claim against you for the return the unlawful bank chargesautolinker.com autolinking image debited from my account.

I am writing to inform you that this will be the next stage unless I receive full payment in the next 7 days of the £2965. detailed in my previous letter to you.

However, please accept this correspondence in accordance with my duty under the Civil Procedureautolinker.com autolinking image Rules to continue to pursue a settlement without the need to invoke the time of the courts

If you do not intend to defend your charges in court, but hoping that I will "just go away" I should to point out that this will not happen and you will incur further costs against you.

Take note that I will draw the Court’s attention to the fact that you have not made any attempts at settlement in accordance with the overriding objectives of CPR. Furthermore I will submit this letter to the Court as further evidence of your intransigence with my case despite my attempts at settlement and the settling by your company of all other similar claims to date.

Alternatively, in accordance with the overriding objectives of the Civil Procedureautolinker.com autolinking image Rules I would like to give you the opportunity to settle this issue without the need to take the time of the Courts. My claim is for £2965.00. If you could ensure that this sum is paid into my bank account within seven days I will inform the court that this matter is settled. If you wish to pursue this course of action please telephone me to obtain my account details.

Please do not waste any further time with something you do not intend to defend.

Yours sincerely
itsmee is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 22nd September 2007, 14:33   #18 (permalink)
Basic Account Holder
 
Watch out, there are Claims Touts about!

Cagger since : Sep 2007
Posts: 21
itsmee Novitiate
Default Re: itsmee v Natwest

please guide me

Im still sat, pen in hand wondering if to send my letter, can somebody let me know if they think its ok as it is
itsmee is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 22nd September 2007, 15:26   #19 (permalink)
Royalties Gold Account Holder
 
Bookworm's Avatar
 
Try our new digital signature service

Cagger since : Feb 2006
I am in: a very bad mood for the last 20 years.
Posts: 20,598
Bookworm AuthoritativeBookworm AuthoritativeBookworm AuthoritativeBookworm AuthoritativeBookworm AuthoritativeBookworm AuthoritativeBookworm AuthoritativeBookworm AuthoritativeBookworm AuthoritativeBookworm AuthoritativeBookworm Authoritative
Default Re: itsmee v Natwest

Honey, you can send them what you want, it will not make one bit of difference. They have now been given an unlimited time NOT to repay your charges, they will use that, depend on it.
Bookworm is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 22nd September 2007, 18:30   #20 (permalink)
Basic Account Holder
 
Protect your signature with SignGuard

Cagger since : Aug 2006
I am in: Bournemouth
Posts: 498
littlesally Informativelittlesally Informativelittlesally Informativelittlesally Informativelittlesally Informative
Default Re: itsmee v Natwest

Itsmee, I am sorry but I have no idea.
I have been out of the claims loop for a little while and things have changed with the court case coming up.

Some claims are being paid out.
A friend of mine was paid out last week, although he settled for about a third under.

Personnally I would send the letter and put something along the lines of "if you use the excuse of the court case, I will be forced to claim £xxx in interestautolinker.com autolinking image, which is what it will amount to. I will not do so if you pay me £2965 within seven days".

All the best,
Sally x
littlesally is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter The Consumer Forums Replies Last Post
Lee v Natwest (Natwest Defence Filed) lsubiela NatWest Bank 26 23rd January 2009 00:10
Fendy V Natwest 16.1k. Anything I Can Do About The Shoddy Envelopes Used By Natwest. fendyweather NatWest Bank 69 23rd June 2007 16:27
NATWEST bank and NATWEST credit card- are they different claims???? mcarreno NatWest Bank 5 11th June 2007 17:46
Please help-Natwest Mortgage For Natwest Advantage Gold juanito12 NatWest Bank 7 4th June 2007 17:49
David Toomey V NatWest Bank PLC - Telephone Call From NatWest davidtoomey NatWest Bank 7 15th April 2007 09:45




The new Consumer Directory
search the web, shop online, looking for gift ideas?

Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131