Thread: Rjh v Lloyds con't...
-
10th October 2006 13:39 #1
Rjh v Lloyds con't...
Received a letter from the court:
Upon the courts own initiative
IT IS ORDERED THAT
Claim be Stayed and to be referred to district judge dudley in box work on 23rd October 2006.
What does this mean exactly?
-
10th October 2006 13:39 # ADS
You can use Google to search the web using these links below:-
-
10th October 2006 13:41 #2Platinum Account Holder
Help the CAG!!
Make a donation
Cagger since Jun 2006
I am in Devon
- Posts 9,557
Re: Rjh v Lloyds con't...
hi mine has been stayed as well it means that no decision will be made about your case until Dudley has looked at it.
Originally Posted by rjhsteel
- Posts 9,557
-
10th October 2006 13:44 #3
Re: Rjh v Lloyds con't...
Just more waited to be done then!!!!
-
10th October 2006 13:45 #4Platinum Account Holder
Help the CAG!!
Make a donation
Cagger since Jun 2006
I am in Devon
- Posts 9,557
Re: Rjh v Lloyds con't...
Yes you can apply to have the stay removed but this cost £35 which you can not claim back.
Originally Posted by rjhsteel
- Posts 9,557
Similar Threads
-
RichardM v Lloyds c/cards. Lloyds playing silly buggers over SAR
By RichardM in forum Lloyds BankReplies: 8Last Post: 26th March 2008, 21:40 -
Claim against lloyds with lloyds loan still active
By macca1301 in forum Lloyds BankReplies: 15Last Post: 17th August 2007, 11:51 -
Lloyds V Angi77777 - ****WON!****
By Angi77777 in forum LloydsTsb SuccessesReplies: 55Last Post: 7th July 2007, 23:36 -
zeus v lloyds - won (for all those sick of lloyds dragging their feet)
By zeusspandex in forum LloydsTsb SuccessesReplies: 43Last Post: 23rd June 2007, 20:40
Reply With Quote

Bookmarks