| | #1 (permalink) |
| Basic Account Holder | Hey Having issues here =). I purchased a car, well i didnt, my brother did on my behlaf. I read the advert, and liked what i saw, sent my brother to collect it and that was that really. When it came back, it had double the miles on it, but the guy said it had a new engine that had only done the advertised one, this i could live with. Next day, noise from engine, took to garage and they said engine has gone (heads). Rang dealer up, said "you havnt let the oil run low have you" funny he should say that, as when my bro got it to me, i had to put 2 lites of oil in in and half a litre of coolant. He is now saying he has no obligation to do anything. Consumer hotline is saying that because the car has done 117k and i cant prove he changed the engine or said he did, that you would expect a car with 117k miles to have issues, But is this right? Was thinking this car cant be fit for purpose? I too purchased based on the advert, and only sent my brother to pick it up, but my brother signed the invoice, where does these leave me? Car was 2k, which was top end of its value, so not cheap, and not a price to make you think its got issues. Was a trader, and got trade receipt. Any help and advice is welcome and wanted, plus any case studies if know thanks |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Classic Account Holder Worried about your signature being copied onto CCAs etc? Use SignGuard Cagger since : Mar 2008 I am in: camborne
Posts: 1,683
![]() ![]() | If he is a trader then it is up to him to put it right, but I would ask for my money back. Write to him rejecting the car and ask for full refund under sale of goods act, not fit for purpose etc. |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Basic Account Holder Watch out, there are Claims Touts about! Cagger since : May 2009
Posts: 9
![]() | Hey thanks for that, cant find the advert so looks like this will make my case worse. I am not sure if i will get anywhere. does anyone have experience or know if i will as the car had 117k miles and maybe its assumed that this car with this type of miles will have some defects? dont know how the courts think.. |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Classic Account Holder Your bank owes you an awful lot more money than you realise See here Cagger since : Mar 2008 I am in: camborne
Posts: 1,683
![]() ![]() | Yep, some wear and tear defects would be expected to be attended to after you have had it for some time, few months maybe, such as exhaust, brake pads, and the like; but this is major and the symptons would have been apparent before you purchased it. Dealers problem. As said before ask for your money back. |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Classic Account Holder | Ditto on that Was it Consumer Direct that came out with the "117k so you should expect probs" comment? If so, I would write a letter of complaint, they are supposed to advise based on the law, not some throway comment (that is crapola!) Disgusting |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Classic Account Holder | Sale of goods act states the item should be fit for purpose for a reasonable amount of time, based on 2k purchase price, no court is ever going to say one day is reasonable It would also be unreasonable for the dealer to have expected you to check the oil inisde of 7 days from sale, arguably much longer |
| | |